NY Times: Impeach Gonzales

July 29, 2007
NY Times: Impeach Gonzales

As far as we can tell, there are three possible explanations for Mr. Gonzales's talk about a dispute over other — unspecified — intelligence activities. One, he lied to Congress. Two, he used a bureaucratic dodge to mislead lawmakers and the public: the spying program was modified after Mr. Ashcroft refused to endorse it, which made it "different" from the one Mr. Bush has acknowledged. The third is that there was more wiretapping than has been disclosed, perhaps even purely domestic wiretapping, and Mr. Gonzales is helping Mr. Bush cover it up.

Democratic lawmakers are asking for a special prosecutor to look into Mr. Gonzales's words and deeds. Solicitor General Paul Clement has a last chance to show that the Justice Department is still minimally functional by fulfilling that request.

NY Times: Bring the Troops Home

July 8, 2007
NY Times: Bring the Troops Home

It is time for the United States to leave Iraq, without any more delay than the Pentagon needs to organize an orderly exit.

Like many Americans, we have put off that conclusion, waiting for a sign that President Bush was seriously trying to dig the United States out of the disaster he created by invading Iraq without sufficient cause, in the face of global opposition, and without a plan to stabilize the country afterward.

Continuing to sacrifice the lives and limbs of American soldiers is wrong. The war is sapping the strength of the nation's alliances and its military forces. It is a dangerous diversion from the life-and-death struggle against terrorists. It is an increasing burden on American taxpayers, and it is a betrayal of a world that needs the wise application of American power and principles.

NY Times Allows Bush to Get Away With Lies About Soldier Salaries

March 29, 2007
NY Times Allows Bush to Get Away With Lies About Soldier Salaries

A March 28 New York Times article reported without refuting President Bush's false claim that the $6.4 million for "the House of Representatives' 'salaries and expense accounts' " -- included in the emergency supplemental bill for the war in Iraq recently approved by the House -- was "not related to the war and protecting the United States of America."

For an additional amount for "Salaries and Expenses", $6,437,000, as follows:

ALLOWANCES AND EXPENSES

For an additional amount for allowances and expenses as authorized by House resolution or law, 16

$6,437,000 for business continuity and disaster recovery, to remain available until expended: Provided, That the amount provided under this heading is designated as making appropriations for contingency operations directly related to the global war on terrorism, and other unanticipated defense-related operations, pursuant to section 402 22 of H. Con. Res. 376 (109th Congress), as made applicable to the House of Representatives by section 511(a)(4) of 24 H. Res. 6 (110th Congress).

NY Times Ignored Polls: Americas are Fed Up

March 29, 2007
NY Times Ignored Polls: Americas are Fed Up

• Contrary to the aides' assertion that the public "is beginning to see improvements on the ground in Iraq," a March 27 USA Today/Gallup poll found that 65 percent of respondents felt the increase in the number of U.S. troops in Baghdad is either "not making much difference" or making the situation there "worse." Moreover, a March 17 Newsweek poll found that 61 percent of respondents think the U.S. is "losing ground in its efforts to establish security and democracy in Iraq."


• Contrary to the aides' claim that the public "is willing to give Mr. Bush's troop buildup a chance," the March 17 Newsweek poll found that just 32 percent of respondents favored "Bush's decision earlier this year to increase the level of U.S. troops in Iraq," while 64 percent were opposed to it.